MFLRC - MF License & Regulatory Consultants

September 29, 2026 · Natural Health Products

No Dairy on the Label, Bovine Colostrum in the Bottle: What the New Roots Recall Teaches About NHP Claim Verification

By Mussarat Fatima

Natural Health ProductsQuality AssuranceLabel
No Dairy on the Label, Bovine Colostrum in the Bottle: What the New Roots Recall Teaches About NHP Claim Verification

A bottle of probiotics was recalled in Canada not because of what was inside it, but because of what the box said was not. In August 2026, one lot of New Roots Herbal Probiotic Intensity was recalled after the outer carton of the 30-count bottles stated that the product contained no dairy. It did contain dairy. The formula includes bovine colostrum, a milk-derived ingredient, and for a person with a severe milk allergy the wrong three words on a box can be dangerous.

Health Canada listed the recall as a Type I event, its most serious class, and flagged it again in the September 2026 Health Product InfoWatch. The lesson is not really about colostrum. It is about the gap between what a label claims and what a quality system has actually verified. An absence claim like no dairy is a regulated statement, and in this case nobody checked it against the formula before the carton went to print.

This article explains why a free-from claim is a claim you must be able to prove, how the New Roots recall happened, and the allergen and claim-verification controls every natural health product (NHP) licence holder should have in place. It builds on our guide to NHP allergen labelling in Canada.

Executive summary

In August 2026, Health Canada recalled one lot of New Roots Herbal Probiotic Intensity (NPN 80136157, lot 68775) because the 30-count carton claimed the product contained no dairy while it contained bovine colostrum, a milk-derived ingredient. The recall was classified Type I. Under subsection 9(1) of the Food and Drugs Act, an NHP label must not be false, misleading or deceptive, and a no dairy claim that is untrue breaches that rule and endangers allergic consumers. The fix is a claim-verification step that reconciles every absence or free-from statement against the finished formula and the allergen status of each ingredient, controlled through artwork approval, specifications and change control.

What happened: the New Roots Probiotic Intensity recall

Direct answer: in August 2026, Health Canada recalled one lot of New Roots Herbal Probiotic Intensity after the outer box of the 30-count bottles incorrectly stated that the product contains no dairy. The product contains bovine colostrum, a dairy ingredient, which can pose a serious risk to people with a severe milk allergy. Health Canada classified the recall as Type I, its most serious class.

The recall carries reference number RA-82454 and covers national distribution. The affected lot, 68775, carries an expiry date of 7 July 2027, and the product had been distributed since October 2025. Consumers with a dairy allergy were told not to use the product and to consult a health care professional if they had used it and had concerns. The event was published in the September 2026 Health Product InfoWatch.

Recall detailInformation
ProductNew Roots Herbal Probiotic Intensity (bottles of 30 and 60 capsules)
NPN80136157
Affected lot68775, expiry 7 July 2027
ReasonThe 30-count carton stated the product contains no dairy; it contains bovine colostrum, a dairy ingredient
Recall classType I, Health Canada's most serious
ReferenceRA-82454, national distribution
Consumer adviceDo not use if you have a dairy allergy; consult a health care professional if concerned

One detail matters for anyone running a quality system. The error was on the 30-count carton, a specific pack size. The formula was not wrong, and the product was not contaminated. A milk-derived ingredient that belonged in the product was contradicted by a claim on one of its packages. That points squarely at an artwork and claim-control failure, not a manufacturing one.

A free-from claim is a regulated claim

Direct answer: a statement that a product is free from dairy, gluten or any allergen is not marketing decoration. It is a claim about composition, and under subsection 9(1) of the Food and Drugs Act it must not be false, misleading or deceptive, or likely to create an erroneous impression about the product. A natural health product is a drug under the Act, so the same rule applies. If the claim is untrue and an allergen is involved, the product is both misbranded and unsafe. The Act adds that a drug labelled contrary to the regulations is deemed to be labelled contrary to subsection 9(1).

Natural health product labels are governed by Part 5 of the Natural Health Products Regulations. Section 86(1) states that no person shall sell a natural health product unless it is labelled and packaged in accordance with the Regulations. Health Canada's labelling requirements checklist directs that label information be consistent with the product licence application and that claims not contravene section 9 of the Act, and it calls for allergen source disclosure where applicable. A free-from claim raises the bar further. You are no longer just declaring what is present, you are guaranteeing what is absent, and that guarantee has to be backed by the formula and by controls.

Claim on the labelWhat you are assertingWhat must back it
Medicinal and non-medicinal ingredient listWhat is in the productThe approved formula and finished product specification
Allergen source declarationWhich priority allergens are presentThe verified allergen status of each ingredient
Free-from or absence claim, such as no dairyThat an allergen is not presentFormula reconciliation, plus cross-contamination controls and testing where the claim relies on segregation
Health or function claimA benefit of the productThe evidence held for the NPN

Bovine colostrum is a dairy ingredient

Direct answer: bovine colostrum is the first milk a cow produces after calving. It is a milk-derived ingredient, and milk is one of Canada's priority food allergens. A product that contains bovine colostrum contains dairy, so a no dairy claim on that product is false on its face, and dangerous to a consumer who relies on it.

Colostrum appears in some immune and probiotic natural health products for its protein and antibody content. Its allergen status is a property of the ingredient, not of the finished product, and that status must be captured on the ingredient specification and the bill of materials, then carried through to the label artwork. The failure in this recall was that the dairy status of colostrum did not stop a no dairy claim from being printed on the 30-count carton. Our guide to probiotics and postbiotics as NHPs covers ingredient identity and claims for this product class, and our article on NHP allergen labelling sets out the labelling rules licence holders miss.

How a claim-verification failure happens, and how to stop it

Direct answer: this kind of recall is almost always an artwork and change-control failure, not a formulation error. The formula was correct. The label was not. It happens when label claims are written or carried over without a formal step that reconciles every claim against the current formula and each ingredient's allergen status, with sign-off before printing.

The usual root causes are familiar. Artwork gets copied from a similar product that genuinely was dairy-free. A marketing claim is added late without quality review. A formula or supplier change does not trigger a label review. Or a pack-size-specific carton is created and the allergen reality is lost in the handoff. Any one of these can put an untrue free-from claim on a printed box while the product itself is exactly as intended.

A corrective and preventive action plan for this failure mode is concrete. Reconcile every on-market label against its current formula. Build a claim register that lists every absence and health claim with the evidence behind it. Require quality assurance to sign off artwork against the formula and the allergen status of each ingredient, for every pack size. Tie label review to change control so any formula, supplier or process change forces a re-check. Then close each action with documented evidence. This is the same discipline behind our work on SFCR allergen control plans and on plant-based and free-from claims, where an undeclared milk allergen has driven more than one recall.

What a QAP should verify before a free-from claim is printed

Direct answer: before any absence or free-from claim goes on a label, a Quality Assurance Person should be able to answer yes, with evidence, to a short set of questions that connect the claim to the formula, the ingredients and the controls behind it. None of these require new testing. They require the records you already hold to be reconciled.

  • Every ingredient in the formula, including carriers and processing aids, is listed with its allergen status.
  • No ingredient carrying the claimed allergen is present. For a no dairy claim, that means no milk or milk derivative such as colostrum, casein, whey, lactose or milk protein.
  • If the claim relies on segregation rather than a milk-free formula, cross-contamination controls and, where needed, testing support it.
  • The claim on this specific pack size and carton matches the approved formula, not a similar product's artwork.
  • Any formula, supplier or process change since the artwork was approved has triggered a fresh label review.
  • The claim register records the claim and its evidence, and quality assurance has signed the artwork.

Claim and allergen control checklist

Use this list to keep an absence or free-from claim truthful across every product and pack size.

  • Maintain an allergen status for every ingredient, including carriers and processing aids, on the specification.
  • Keep a claim register listing every absence, free-from and health claim, with the evidence that supports it.
  • Reconcile each label claim against the current finished formula before artwork is approved.
  • Require the QAP or quality assurance to sign off label artwork against the formula and allergen status, per pack size.
  • Tie label review to change control so any formula, supplier or process change triggers a re-check.
  • Where an absence claim relies on segregation, validate cleaning and cross-contamination controls and test as needed.
  • Declare allergen sources on the label where applicable, consistent with Health Canada NHP labelling guidance.
  • Ensure no label, on any pack size, is false, misleading or deceptive under subsection 9(1) of the Food and Drugs Act.
  • Run periodic label-to-formula reconciliation across the on-market portfolio, not only at launch.
  • Keep a documented recall procedure and run a mock recall so a real one is fast and controlled.

Common mistakes

  • Treating label artwork as a marketing asset instead of a controlled document.
  • Carrying a free-from claim over from a similar product without checking the current formula.
  • Missing that an ingredient such as bovine colostrum, casein, whey or lactose is a milk derivative.
  • Approving a formula or supplier change without triggering a label review.
  • Applying the claim correctly to one pack size but missing a different carton for another pack size.
  • Relying on a supplier statement without capturing the allergen status on your own specification.
  • Assuming NHPs are exempt from the false-or-misleading rule, when subsection 9(1) applies to drugs, including NHPs.

Frequently asked questions

Why was New Roots Herbal Probiotic Intensity recalled?

In August 2026, Health Canada recalled one lot because the outer box of the 30-count bottles incorrectly stated the product contains no dairy. The product contains bovine colostrum, a dairy ingredient, which poses a serious risk to people with a severe milk allergy. The recall was classified Type I.

Is a no dairy claim regulated in Canada?

Yes. A natural health product is a drug under the Food and Drugs Act, and subsection 9(1) prohibits labelling that is false, misleading or deceptive. A no dairy claim on a product that contains a milk-derived ingredient breaches that rule, and NHP labelling must also comply with Part 5 of the Natural Health Products Regulations.

Is bovine colostrum a dairy or milk allergen?

Yes. Bovine colostrum is the first milk a cow produces after calving. It is milk-derived, and milk is one of Canada's priority food allergens. A product that contains bovine colostrum contains dairy.

What is a Type I recall in Canada?

A Type I recall is Health Canada's most serious class. It is used where there is a reasonable probability that using or being exposed to the product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death. A mis-declared allergen in a product used by allergic consumers can meet that bar.

How do I verify a free-from claim before printing a label?

Reconcile the claim against the current finished formula and the allergen status of every ingredient, including carriers and processing aids. Where the claim relies on segregation rather than a free-from formula, support it with cross-contamination controls and testing. Record the claim and its evidence, and have quality assurance sign the artwork for each pack size.

Do natural health products have to declare allergens?

Health Canada's NHP labelling guidance calls for allergen source disclosure where applicable, and labels must not be false, misleading or deceptive under subsection 9(1). Whether or not a positive declaration is required for a given product, any absence claim you choose to make must be true and verifiable.

How MFLRC can help

MF License and Regulatory Consultants helps NHP licence holders build the claim-verification and allergen controls that keep a label truthful. We map every product's claims to its formula, capture the allergen status of each ingredient on your specifications, and write the artwork approval and change-control SOPs that stop a false free-from claim from ever reaching print. Our audit services run label-to-formula reconciliation and mock recalls, our quality assurance services build the specifications and claim register behind every claim, and our regulatory affairs and licensing team reviews labelling against the Natural Health Products Regulations and subsection 9(1). See our full natural health products practice for how the pieces fit together.

Worried that a free-from claim on one of your labels cannot be proven? Book a claim and allergen label review with MFLRC before a recall does it for you.

Conclusion

The New Roots recall is a small error with a serious edge. Three words on a carton, no dairy, were not true, and for an allergic consumer that is the difference between safe and not. The product was fine; the control around the claim was not. Treat every absence and free-from claim as a promise you must be able to prove, reconcile it against the formula, and put a quality sign-off between the claim and the printer. Do that, and a label becomes an asset rather than a recall waiting to happen. If you would like MFLRC to review your labels and claims, get in touch with our team.

Sources and references

Downloadable Resource

NHP Label Claim and Allergen Verification Checklist

A one-page MFLRC checklist for natural health product licence holders: reconcile every free-from and absence claim against the formula and each ingredient's allergen status before artwork is approved, per pack size.

File: MFLRC-NHP-Label-Claim-Allergen-Verification-Checklist.pdf

Fill in your details below and the download link will appear right away.

Share with others

Tags

Natural Health ProductsAllergen ControlHealth CanadaProbioticsRecall ClassificationCAPA
Book a consultation